↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Reduced Performance of Prey Targeting in Pit Vipers with Contralaterally Occluded Infrared and Visual Senses

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Reduced Performance of Prey Targeting in Pit Vipers with Contralaterally Occluded Infrared and Visual Senses
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0034989
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qin Chen, Huanhuan Deng, Steven E. Brauth, Li Ding, Yezhong Tang

Abstract

Both visual and infrared (IR) senses are utilized in prey targeting by pit vipers. Visual and IR inputs project to the contralateral optic tectum where they activate both multimodal and bimodal neurons. A series of ocular and pit organ occlusion experiments using the short-tailed pit viper (Gloydius brevicaudus) were conducted to investigate the role of visual and IR information during prey targeting. Compared with unoccluded controls, snakes with either both eyes or pit organs occluded performed more poorly in hunting prey although such subjects still captured prey on 75% of trials. Subjects with one eye and one pit occluded on the same side of the face performed as well as those with bilateral occlusion although these subjects showed a significant targeting angle bias toward the unoccluded side. Performance was significantly poorer when only a single eye or pit was available. Interestingly, when one eye and one pit organ were occluded on opposite sides of the face, performance was poorest, the snakes striking prey on no more than half the trials. These results indicate that, visual and infrared information are both effective in prey targeting in this species, although interference between the two modalities occurs if visual and IR information is restricted to opposite sides of the brain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 48 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 6 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 9 17%