↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Promoting Life Skills and Preventing Tobacco Use among Low-Income Mumbai Youth: Effects of Salaam Bombay Foundation Intervention

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Promoting Life Skills and Preventing Tobacco Use among Low-Income Mumbai Youth: Effects of Salaam Bombay Foundation Intervention
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0034982
Pubmed ID
Authors

Glorian Sorensen, Prakash C. Gupta, Eve Nagler, Kasisomayajula Viswanath

Abstract

In response to India's growing tobacco epidemic, strategies are needed to decrease tobacco use among Indian youth, particularly among those who are economically disadvantaged. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a school-based life-skills tobacco control program for youth of low socio-economic status in Mumbai and the surrounding state of Maharashtra. We hypothesized that compared to youth in control schools, youth exposed to the program would have greater knowledge of effects of tobacco use; be more likely to take action to prevent others from using tobacco; demonstrate more positive life skills and attitudes; and be less likely to report tobacco use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 132 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 20%
Researcher 25 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 8 6%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 22%
Social Sciences 20 14%
Psychology 17 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 34 25%