↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Influence of Motor Planning on Distance Perception within the Peripersonal Space

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Influence of Motor Planning on Distance Perception within the Peripersonal Space
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0034880
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wladimir Kirsch, Oliver Herbort, Martin V. Butz, Wilfried Kunde

Abstract

We examined whether movement costs as defined by movement magnitude have an impact on distance perception in near space. In Experiment 1, participants were given a numerical cue regarding the amplitude of a hand movement to be carried out. Before the movement execution, the length of a visual distance had to be judged. These visual distances were judged to be larger, the larger the amplitude of the concurrently prepared hand movement was. In Experiment 2, in which numerical cues were merely memorized without concurrent movement planning, this general increase of distance with cue size was not observed. The results of these experiments indicate that visual perception of near space is specifically affected by the costs of planned hand movements.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 25%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor 6 10%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 43%
Neuroscience 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 9 15%