Title |
Structural Disorder in Eukaryotes
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0034687 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rita Pancsa, Peter Tompa |
Abstract |
Based on early bioinformatic studies on a handful of species, the frequency of structural disorder of proteins is generally thought to be much higher in eukaryotes than in prokaryotes. To refine this view, we present here a comparative prediction study and analysis of 194 fully described eukaryotic proteomes and 87 reference prokaryotes for structural disorder. We found that structural disorder does distinguish eukaryotes from prokaryotes, but its frequency spans a very wide range in the two superkingdoms that largely overlap. The number of disordered binding regions and different Pfam domain types also contribute to distinguish eukaryotes from prokaryotes. Unexpectedly, the highest levels--and highest variability--of predicted disorder is found in protists, i.e. single-celled eukaryotes, often surpassing more complex eukaryote organisms, plants and animals. This trend contrasts with that of the number of domain types, which increases rather monotonously toward more complex organisms. The level of structural disorder appears to be strongly correlated with lifestyle, because some obligate intracellular parasites and endosymbionts have the lowest levels, whereas host-changing parasites have the highest level of predicted disorder. We conclude that protists have been the evolutionary hot-bed of experimentation with structural disorder, in a period when structural disorder was actively invented and the major functional classes of disordered proteins established. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 1% |
United States | 2 | 1% |
Canada | 2 | 1% |
Hungary | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Poland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 168 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 28% |
Researcher | 29 | 16% |
Student > Master | 27 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
Professor | 8 | 4% |
Other | 31 | 17% |
Unknown | 20 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 71 | 40% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 50 | 28% |
Chemistry | 11 | 6% |
Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 6% |
Unknown | 25 | 14% |