↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Animal or Plant: Which Is the Better Fog Water Collector?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Animal or Plant: Which Is the Better Fog Water Collector?
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0034603
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Nørgaard, Martin Ebner, Marie Dacke

Abstract

Occasional fog is a critical water source utilised by plants and animals in the Namib Desert. Fog basking beetles (Onymacris unguicularis, Tenebrionidae) and Namib dune bushman grass (Stipagrostris sabulicola, Poaceae) collect water directly from the fog. While the beetles position themselves optimally for fog water collection on dune ridges, the grass occurs predominantly at the dune base where less fog water is available. Differences in the fog-water collecting abilities in animals and plants have never been addressed. Here we place beetles and grass side-by-side in a fog chamber and measure the amount of water they collect over time. Based on the accumulated amount of water over a two hour period, grass is the better fog collector. However, in contrast to the episodic cascading water run-off from the grass, the beetles obtain water in a steady flow from their elytra. This steady trickle from the beetles' elytra to their mouth could ensure that even short periods of fog basking--while exposed to predators--will yield water. Up to now there is no indication of specialised surface properties on the grass leafs, but the steady run-off from the beetles could point to specific property adaptations of their elytra surface.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 2%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 21%
Environmental Science 14 16%
Engineering 11 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 8%
Chemistry 4 5%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 16 19%