↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Global Assessment of Extinction Risk to Populations of Sockeye Salmon Oncorhynchus nerka

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Global Assessment of Extinction Risk to Populations of Sockeye Salmon Oncorhynchus nerka
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0034065
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter S. Rand, Matthew Goslin, Mart R. Gross, James R. Irvine, Xanthippe Augerot, Peter A. McHugh, Victor F. Bugaev

Abstract

Concern about the decline of wild salmon has attracted the attention of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). The IUCN applies quantitative criteria to assess risk of extinction and publishes its results on the Red List of Threatened Species. However, the focus is on the species level and thus may fail to show the risk to populations. The IUCN has adapted their criteria to apply to populations but there exist few examples of this type of assessment. We assessed the status of sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka as a model for application of the IUCN population-level assessments and to provide the first global assessment of the status of an anadromous Pacific salmon.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 3%
United States 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 86 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 22%
Student > Bachelor 18 19%
Student > Master 13 14%
Professor 4 4%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 49%
Environmental Science 24 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 12 13%