↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Chemical Clearing and Dehydration of GFP Expressing Mouse Brains

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
11 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
256 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
448 Mendeley
Title
Chemical Clearing and Dehydration of GFP Expressing Mouse Brains
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0033916
Pubmed ID
Authors

Klaus Becker, Nina Jährling, Saiedeh Saghafi, Reto Weiler, Hans-Ulrich Dodt

Abstract

Generally, chemical tissue clearing is performed by a solution consisting of two parts benzyl benzoate and one part benzyl alcohol. However, prolonged exposure to this mixture markedly reduces the fluorescence of GFP expressing specimens, so that one has to compromise between clearing quality and fluorescence preservation. This can be a severe drawback when working with specimens exhibiting low GFP expression rates. Thus, we screened for a substitute and found that dibenzyl ether (phenylmethoxymethylbenzene, CAS 103-50-4) can be applied as a more GFP-friendly clearing medium. Clearing with dibenzyl ether provides improved tissue transparency and strikingly improved fluorescence intensity in GFP expressing mouse brains and other samples as mouse spinal cords, or embryos. Chemical clearing, staining, and embedding of biological samples mostly requires careful foregoing tissue dehydration. The commonly applied tissue dehydration medium is ethanol, which also can markedly impair GFP fluorescence. Screening for a substitute also for ethanol we found that tetrahydrofuran (CAS 109-99-9) is a more GFP-friendly dehydration medium than ethanol, providing better tissue transparency obtained by successive clearing. Combined, tetrahydrofuran and dibenzyl ether allow dehydration and chemical clearing of even delicate samples for UM, confocal microscopy, and other microscopy techniques.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
Austria 5 1%
Germany 5 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 415 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 106 24%
Researcher 104 23%
Student > Master 60 13%
Student > Bachelor 39 9%
Student > Postgraduate 16 4%
Other 47 10%
Unknown 76 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 158 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 11%
Neuroscience 50 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 9%
Engineering 22 5%
Other 50 11%
Unknown 78 17%