↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Feasibility and Impact of Delivering a Mind-Body Intervention in a Virtual World

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
Title
The Feasibility and Impact of Delivering a Mind-Body Intervention in a Virtual World
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0033843
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel B. Hoch, Alice J. Watson, Deborah A. Linton, Heather E. Bello, Marco Senelly, Mariola T. Milik, Margaret A. Baim, Kamal Jethwani, Gregory L. Fricchione, Herbert Benson, Joseph C. Kvedar

Abstract

Mind-body medical approaches may ameliorate chronic disease. Stress reduction is particularly helpful, but face-to-face delivery systems cannot reach all those who might benefit. An online, 3-dimensional virtual world may be able to support the rich interpersonal interactions required of this approach. In this pilot study, we explore the feasibility of translating a face-to-face stress reduction program into an online virtual setting and estimate the effect size of the intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Norway 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 190 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 16%
Student > Master 27 13%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 15 7%
Other 47 23%
Unknown 40 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 71 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 11%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 44 22%