↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Failing the Future: Three Unsuccessful Attempts to Replicate Bem's ‘Retroactive Facilitation of Recall’ Effect

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
Title
Failing the Future: Three Unsuccessful Attempts to Replicate Bem's ‘Retroactive Facilitation of Recall’ Effect
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0033423
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart J. Ritchie, Richard Wiseman, Christopher C. French

Abstract

Nine recently reported parapsychological experiments appear to support the existence of precognition. We describe three pre-registered independent attempts to exactly replicate one of these experiments, 'retroactive facilitation of recall', which examines whether performance on a memory test can be influenced by a post-test exercise. All three replication attempts failed to produce significant effects (combined n = 150; combined p = .83, one-tailed) and thus do not support the existence of psychic ability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Netherlands 5 2%
Germany 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 206 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 42 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 17%
Student > Master 25 11%
Researcher 21 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 7%
Other 64 27%
Unknown 26 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 134 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Computer Science 6 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 36 15%