↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Role of the Rat Medial Prefrontal Cortex in Adapting to Changes in Instrumental Contingency

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
The Role of the Rat Medial Prefrontal Cortex in Adapting to Changes in Instrumental Contingency
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0033302
Pubmed ID
Authors

Etienne Coutureau, Frederic Esclassan, Georges Di Scala, Alain R. Marchand

Abstract

In order to select actions appropriate to current needs, a subject must identify relationships between actions and events. Control over the environment is determined by the degree to which action consequences can be predicted, as described by action-outcome contingencies--i.e. performing an action should affect the probability of the outcome. We evaluated in a first experiment adaptation to contingency changes in rats with neurotoxic lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex. Results indicate that this brain region is not critical to adjust instrumental responding to a negative contingency where the rats must refrain from pressing a lever, as this action prevents reward delivery. By contrast, this brain region is required to reduce responding in a non-contingent situation where the same number of rewards is freely delivered and actions do not affect the outcome any more. In a second experiment, we determined that this effect does not result from a different perception of temporal relationships between actions and outcomes since lesioned rats adapted normally to gradually increasing delays in reward delivery. These data indicate that the medial prefrontal cortex is not directly involved in evaluating the correlation between action--and reward--rates or in the perception of reward delays. The deficit in lesioned rats appears to consist of an abnormal response to the balance between contingent and non-contingent rewards. By highlighting the role of prefrontal regions in adapting to the causal status of actions, these data contribute to our understanding of the neural basis of choice tasks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
France 3 4%
Austria 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Ghana 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 68 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 33%
Researcher 22 27%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 3 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 29 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 24%
Psychology 11 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 7 9%