↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Evaluation of Genetic Mutations Associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis Resistance to Amikacin, Kanamycin and Capreomycin: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of Genetic Mutations Associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis Resistance to Amikacin, Kanamycin and Capreomycin: A Systematic Review
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0033275
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophia B. Georghiou, Marisa Magana, Richard S. Garfein, Donald G. Catanzaro, Antonino Catanzaro, Timothy C. Rodwell

Abstract

Rapid molecular diagnostics for detecting multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (M/XDR-TB) primarily identify mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) genes associated with drug resistance. Their accuracy, however, is dependent largely on the strength of the association between a specific mutation and the phenotypic resistance of the isolate with that mutation, which is not always 100%. While this relationship is well established and reliable for first-line anti-TB drugs, rifampin and isoniazid, it is less well-studied and understood for second-line, injectable drugs, amikacin (AMK), kanamycin (KAN) and capreomycin (CAP).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 3 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 290 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 20%
Researcher 46 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 9%
Other 17 6%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 54 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 27 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 63 21%