↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Helpers at the Nest Improve Late-Life Offspring Performance: Evidence from a Long-Term Study and a Cross-Foster Experiment

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Helpers at the Nest Improve Late-Life Offspring Performance: Evidence from a Long-Term Study and a Cross-Foster Experiment
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0033167
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lyanne Brouwer, David S. Richardson, Jan Komdeur

Abstract

Conditions during an individual's rearing period can have far reaching consequences for its survival and reproduction later in life. Conditions typically vary due to variation in parental quality and/or the environment, but in cooperative breeders the presence of helpers adds an important component to this. Determining the causal effect of helpers on offspring fitness is difficult, since high-quality breeders or territories are likely to produce high-quality offspring, but are also more likely to have helpers because of past reproductive success. This problem is best resolved by comparing the effect of both helping and non-helping subordinates on offspring fitness, however species in which both type of subordinates commonly occur are rare.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Netherlands 2 2%
France 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 80 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 24%
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 57%
Environmental Science 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Linguistics 1 1%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 22 25%