↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Creating Non-Believed Memories for Recent Autobiographical Events

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
24 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Creating Non-Believed Memories for Recent Autobiographical Events
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0032998
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Clark, Robert A. Nash, Gabrielle Fincham, Giuliana Mazzoni

Abstract

A recent study showed that many people spontaneously report vivid memories of events that they do not believe to have occurred [1]. In the present experiment we tested for the first time whether, after powerful false memories have been created, debriefing might leave behind nonbelieved memories for the fake events. In Session 1 participants imitated simple actions, and in Session 2 they saw doctored video-recordings containing clips that falsely suggested they had performed additional (fake) actions. As in earlier studies, this procedure created powerful false memories. In Session 3, participants were debriefed and told that specific actions in the video were not truly performed. Beliefs and memories for all critical actions were tested before and after the debriefing. Results showed that debriefing undermined participants' beliefs in fake actions, but left behind residual memory-like content. These results indicate that debriefing can leave behind vivid false memories which are no longer believed, and thus we demonstrate for the first time that the memory of an event can be experimentally dissociated from the belief in the event's occurrence. These results also confirm that belief in and memory for an event can be independently-occurring constructs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
Germany 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
China 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 70 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Student > Postgraduate 10 12%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 12%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Computer Science 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 11 13%