↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Second Language Processing Shows Increased Native-Like Neural Responses after Months of No Exposure

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
36 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
Title
Second Language Processing Shows Increased Native-Like Neural Responses after Months of No Exposure
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0032974
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kara Morgan-Short, Ingrid Finger, Sarah Grey, Michael T. Ullman

Abstract

Although learning a second language (L2) as an adult is notoriously difficult, research has shown that adults can indeed attain native language-like brain processing and high proficiency levels. However, it is important to then retain what has been attained, even in the absence of continued exposure to the L2--particularly since periods of minimal or no L2 exposure are common. This event-related potential (ERP) study of an artificial language tested performance and neural processing following a substantial period of no exposure. Adults learned to speak and comprehend the artificial language to high proficiency with either explicit, classroom-like, or implicit, immersion-like training, and then underwent several months of no exposure to the language. Surprisingly, proficiency did not decrease during this delay. Instead, it remained unchanged, and there was an increase in native-like neural processing of syntax, as evidenced by several ERP changes--including earlier, more reliable, and more left-lateralized anterior negativities, and more robust P600s, in response to word-order violations. Moreover, both the explicitly and implicitly trained groups showed increased native-like ERP patterns over the delay, indicating that such changes can hold independently of L2 training type. The results demonstrate that substantial periods with no L2 exposure are not necessarily detrimental. Rather, benefits may ensue from such periods of time even when there is no L2 exposure. Interestingly, both before and after the delay the implicitly trained group showed more native-like processing than the explicitly trained group, indicating that type of training also affects the attainment of native-like processing in the brain. Overall, the findings may be largely explained by a combination of forgetting and consolidation in declarative and procedural memory, on which L2 grammar learning appears to depend. The study has a range of implications, and suggests a research program with potentially important consequences for second language acquisition and related fields.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 179 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 26%
Student > Master 34 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Researcher 18 9%
Professor 15 8%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 23 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 61 31%
Psychology 52 27%
Neuroscience 16 8%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 28 14%