↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Rhodococcus Bacteremia in Cancer Patients Is Mostly Catheter Related and Associated with Biofilm Formation

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Rhodococcus Bacteremia in Cancer Patients Is Mostly Catheter Related and Associated with Biofilm Formation
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0032945
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fadi Al Akhrass, Iba Al Wohoush, Anne-Marie Chaftari, Ruth Reitzel, Ying Jiang, Mahmoud Ghannoum, Jeffrey Tarrand, Ray Hachem, Issam Raad

Abstract

Rhodococcus is an emerging cause of opportunistic infection in immunocompromised patients, most commonly causing cavitary pneumonia. It has rarely been reported as a cause of isolated bacteremia. However, the relationship between bacteremia and central venous catheter is unknown. Between 2002 and 2010, the characteristics and outcomes of seventeen cancer patients with Rhodococcus bacteremia and indwelling central venous catheters were evaluated. Rhodococcus bacteremias were for the most part (94%) central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). Most of the bacteremia isolates were Rhodococcus equi (82%). Rhodococcus isolates formed heavy microbial biofilm on the surface of polyurethane catheters, which was reduced completely or partially by antimicrobial lock solution. All CLABSI patients had successful response to catheter removal and antimicrobial therapy. Rhodococcus species should be added to the list of biofilm forming organisms in immunocompromised hosts and most of the Rhodococcus bacteremias in cancer patients are central line associated.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 13 36%