↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Blue Whales Respond to Anthropogenic Noise

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
348 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Blue Whales Respond to Anthropogenic Noise
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0032681
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariana L. Melcón, Amanda J. Cummins, Sara M. Kerosky, Lauren K. Roche, Sean M. Wiggins, John A. Hildebrand

Abstract

Anthropogenic noise may significantly impact exposed marine mammals. This work studied the vocalization response of endangered blue whales to anthropogenic noise sources in the mid-frequency range using passive acoustic monitoring in the Southern California Bight. Blue whales were less likely to produce calls when mid-frequency active sonar was present. This reduction was more pronounced when the sonar source was closer to the animal, at higher sound levels. The animals were equally likely to stop calling at any time of day, showing no diel pattern in their sensitivity to sonar. Conversely, the likelihood of whales emitting calls increased when ship sounds were nearby. Whales did not show a differential response to ship noise as a function of the time of the day either. These results demonstrate that anthropogenic noise, even at frequencies well above the blue whales' sound production range, has a strong probability of eliciting changes in vocal behavior. The long-term implications of disruption in call production to blue whale foraging and other behaviors are currently not well understood.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
French Guiana 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 329 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 68 20%
Researcher 66 19%
Student > Master 52 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 13%
Other 20 6%
Other 45 13%
Unknown 52 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 161 46%
Environmental Science 70 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Engineering 8 2%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 61 18%