↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

In Vitro Characterization of a Nineteenth-Century Therapy for Smallpox

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
667 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
In Vitro Characterization of a Nineteenth-Century Therapy for Smallpox
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0032610
Pubmed ID
Authors

William Arndt, Chandra Mitnik, Karen L. Denzler, Stacy White, Robert Waters, Bertram L. Jacobs, Yvan Rochon, Victoria A. Olson, Inger K. Damon, Jeffrey O. Langland

Abstract

In the nineteenth century, smallpox ravaged through the United States and Canada. At this time, a botanical preparation, derived from the carnivorous plant Sarracenia purpurea, was proclaimed as being a successful therapy for smallpox infections. The work described characterizes the antipoxvirus activity associated with this botanical extract against vaccinia virus, monkeypox virus and variola virus, the causative agent of smallpox. Our work demonstrates the in vitro characterization of Sarracenia purpurea as the first effective inhibitor of poxvirus replication at the level of early viral transcription. With the renewed threat of poxvirus-related infections, our results indicate Sarracenia purpurea may act as another defensive measure against Orthopoxvirus infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 667 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Other 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 19 35%