↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Protecting Important Sites for Biodiversity Contributes to Meeting Global Conservation Targets

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
697 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Protecting Important Sites for Biodiversity Contributes to Meeting Global Conservation Targets
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0032529
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart H. M. Butchart, Jörn P. W. Scharlemann, Mike I. Evans, Suhel Quader, Salvatore Aricò, Julius Arinaitwe, Mark Balman, Leon A. Bennun, Bastian Bertzky, Charles Besançon, Timothy M. Boucher, Thomas M. Brooks, Ian J. Burfield, Neil D. Burgess, Simba Chan, Rob P. Clay, Mike J. Crosby, Nicholas C. Davidson, Naamal De Silva, Christian Devenish, Guy C. L. Dutson, David F. Día z Fernández, Lincoln D. C. Fishpool, Claire Fitzgerald, Matt Foster, Melanie F. Heath, Marc Hockings, Michael Hoffmann, David Knox, Frank W. Larsen, John F. Lamoreux, Colby Loucks, Ian May, James Millett, Dominic Molloy, Paul Morling, Mike Parr, Taylor H. Ricketts, Nathalie Seddon, Benjamin Skolnik, Simon N. Stuart, Amy Upgren, Stephen Woodley

Abstract

Protected areas (PAs) are a cornerstone of conservation efforts and now cover nearly 13% of the world's land surface, with the world's governments committed to expand this to 17%. However, as biodiversity continues to decline, the effectiveness of PAs in reducing the extinction risk of species remains largely untested. We analyzed PA coverage and trends in species' extinction risk at globally significant sites for conserving birds (10,993 Important Bird Areas, IBAs) and highly threatened vertebrates and conifers (588 Alliance for Zero Extinction sites, AZEs) (referred to collectively hereafter as 'important sites'). Species occurring in important sites with greater PA coverage experienced smaller increases in extinction risk over recent decades: the increase was half as large for bird species with>50% of the IBAs at which they occur completely covered by PAs, and a third lower for birds, mammals and amphibians restricted to protected AZEs (compared with unprotected or partially protected sites). Globally, half of the important sites for biodiversity conservation remain unprotected (49% of IBAs, 51% of AZEs). While PA coverage of important sites has increased over time, the proportion of PA area covering important sites, as opposed to less important land, has declined (by 0.45-1.14% annually since 1950 for IBAs and 0.79-1.49% annually for AZEs). Thus, while appropriately located PAs may slow the rate at which species are driven towards extinction, recent PA network expansion has under-represented important sites. We conclude that better targeted expansion of PA networks would help to improve biodiversity trends.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 697 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 1%
Brazil 6 <1%
France 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Other 12 2%
Unknown 656 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 146 21%
Student > Master 120 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 105 15%
Student > Bachelor 65 9%
Other 45 6%
Other 119 17%
Unknown 97 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 258 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 239 34%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 1%
Social Sciences 9 1%
Other 40 6%
Unknown 122 18%