↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Impartial Third-Party Interventions in Captive Chimpanzees: A Reflection of Community Concern

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
18 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Impartial Third-Party Interventions in Captive Chimpanzees: A Reflection of Community Concern
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0032494
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Rudolf von Rohr, Sonja E. Koski, Judith M. Burkart, Clare Caws, Orlaith N. Fraser, Angela Ziltener, Carel P. van Schaik

Abstract

Because conflicts among social group members are inevitable, their management is crucial for group stability. The rarest and most interesting form of conflict management is policing, i.e., impartial interventions by bystanders, which is of considerable interest due to its potentially moral nature. Here, we provide descriptive and quantitative data on policing in captive chimpanzees. First, we report on a high rate of policing in one captive group characterized by recently introduced females and a rank reversal between two males. We explored the influence of various factors on the occurrence of policing. The results show that only the alpha and beta males acted as arbitrators using manifold tactics to control conflicts, and that their interventions strongly depended on conflict complexity. Secondly, we compared the policing patterns in three other captive chimpanzee groups. We found that although rare, policing was more prevalent at times of increased social instability, both high-ranking males and females performed policing, and conflicts of all sex-dyad combinations were policed. These results suggest that the primary function of policing is to increase group stability. It may thus reflect prosocial behaviour based upon "community concern." However, policing remains a rare behaviour and more data are needed to test the generality of this hypothesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 144 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 19%
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Other 9 6%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 35%
Psychology 29 19%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 30 19%