↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Waist Circumference Adjusted for Body Mass Index and Intra-Abdominal Fat Mass

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Waist Circumference Adjusted for Body Mass Index and Intra-Abdominal Fat Mass
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0032213
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tina Landsvig Berentzen, Lars Ängquist, Anna Kotronen, Ronald Borra, Hannele Yki-Järvinen, Patricia Iozzo, Riitta Parkkola, Pirjo Nuutila, Robert Ross, David B. Allison, Steven B. Heymsfield, Kim Overvad, Thorkild I. A. Sørensen, Marianne Uhre Jakobsen

Abstract

The association between waist circumference (WC) and mortality is particularly strong and direct when adjusted for body mass index (BMI). One conceivable explanation for this association is that WC adjusted for BMI is a better predictor of the presumably most harmful intra-abdominal fat mass (IAFM) than WC alone. We studied the prediction of abdominal subcutaneous fat mass (ASFM) and IAFM by WC alone and by addition of BMI as an explanatory factor.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Master 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Sports and Recreations 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 11 21%