↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Deciphering CAPTCHAs: What a Turing Test Reveals about Human Cognition

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Deciphering CAPTCHAs: What a Turing Test Reveals about Human Cognition
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0032121
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Hannagan, Maria Ktori, Myriam Chanceaux, Jonathan Grainger

Abstract

Turning Turing's logic on its head, we used widespread letter-based Turing Tests found on the internet (CAPTCHAs) to shed light on human cognition. We examined the basis of the human ability to solve CAPTCHAs, where machines fail. We asked whether this is due to our use of slow-acting inferential processes that would not be available to machines, or whether fast-acting automatic orthographic processing in humans has superior robustness to shape variations. A masked priming lexical decision experiment revealed efficient processing of CAPTCHA words in conditions that rule out the use of slow inferential processing. This shows that the human superiority in solving CAPTCHAs builds on a high degree of invariance to location and continuous transforms, which is achieved during the very early stages of visual word recognition in skilled readers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 38 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 29%
Computer Science 4 10%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Engineering 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 11 27%