↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Early versus Delayed Decompression for Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS)

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
978 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
794 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Early versus Delayed Decompression for Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS)
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0032037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael G. Fehlings, Alexander Vaccaro, Jefferson R. Wilson, Anoushka Singh, David W. Cadotte, James S. Harrop, Bizhan Aarabi, Christopher Shaffrey, Marcel Dvorak, Charles Fisher, Paul Arnold, Eric M. Massicotte, Stephen Lewis, Raja Rampersaud

Abstract

There is convincing preclinical evidence that early decompression in the setting of spinal cord injury (SCI) improves neurologic outcomes. However, the effect of early surgical decompression in patients with acute SCI remains uncertain. Our objective was to evaluate the relative effectiveness of early (<24 hours after injury) versus late (≥ 24 hours after injury) decompressive surgery after traumatic cervical SCI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 794 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 783 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 114 14%
Student > Postgraduate 102 13%
Researcher 80 10%
Student > Bachelor 80 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 74 9%
Other 192 24%
Unknown 152 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 426 54%
Neuroscience 65 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 3%
Engineering 11 1%
Other 37 5%
Unknown 203 26%