↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Evidence for Altered Basal Ganglia-Brainstem Connections in Cervical Dystonia

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Evidence for Altered Basal Ganglia-Brainstem Connections in Cervical Dystonia
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0031654
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne J. Blood, John K. Kuster, Sandra C. Woodman, Namik Kirlic, Miriam L. Makhlouf, Trisha J. Multhaupt-Buell, Nikos Makris, Martin Parent, Lewis R. Sudarsky, Greta Sjalander, Henry Breiter, Hans C. Breiter, Nutan Sharma

Abstract

There has been increasing interest in the interaction of the basal ganglia with the cerebellum and the brainstem in motor control and movement disorders. In addition, it has been suggested that these subcortical connections with the basal ganglia may help to coordinate a network of regions involved in mediating posture and stabilization. While studies in animal models support a role for this circuitry in the pathophysiology of the movement disorder dystonia, thus far, there is only indirect evidence for this in humans with dystonia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Sweden 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 78 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 29%
Neuroscience 19 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Unspecified 4 5%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 19 22%