↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Evaluating Characteristics of De Novo Assembly Software on 454 Transcriptome Data: A Simulation Approach

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Evaluating Characteristics of De Novo Assembly Software on 454 Transcriptome Data: A Simulation Approach
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0031410
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marvin Mundry, Erich Bornberg-Bauer, Michael Sammeth, Philine G. D. Feulner

Abstract

The quantity of transcriptome data is rapidly increasing for non-model organisms. As sequencing technology advances, focus shifts towards solving bioinformatic challenges, of which sequence read assembly is the first task. Recent studies have compared the performance of different software to establish a best practice for transcriptome assembly. Here, we adapted a simulation approach to evaluate specific features of assembly programs on 454 data. The novelty of our study is that the simulation allows us to calculate a model assembly as reference point for comparison.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 5 3%
United States 4 2%
Brazil 3 2%
Sweden 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 168 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 28%
Researcher 49 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 9%
Student > Master 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 10 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 127 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 14%
Computer Science 9 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 18 9%