↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Genetic Association Analysis Using Sibship Data: A Multilevel Model Approach

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Genetic Association Analysis Using Sibship Data: A Multilevel Model Approach
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0031134
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yang Zhao, Hao Yu, Ying Zhu, Monica Ter-Minassian, Zhihang Peng, Hongbing Shen, Nancy Diao, Feng Chen

Abstract

Family based association study (FBAS) has the advantages of controlling for population stratification and testing for linkage and association simultaneously. We propose a retrospective multilevel model (rMLM) approach to analyze sibship data by using genotypic information as the dependent variable. Simulated data sets were generated using the simulation of linkage and association (SIMLA) program. We compared rMLM to sib transmission/disequilibrium test (S-TDT), sibling disequilibrium test (SDT), conditional logistic regression (CLR) and generalized estimation equations (GEE) on the measures of power, type I error, estimation bias and standard error. The results indicated that rMLM was a valid test of association in the presence of linkage using sibship data. The advantages of rMLM became more evident when the data contained concordant sibships. Compared to GEE, rMLM had less underestimated odds ratio (OR). Our results support the application of rMLM to detect gene-disease associations using sibship data. However, the risk of increasing type I error rate should be cautioned when there is association without linkage between the disease locus and the genotyped marker.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 13%
United States 1 7%
Italy 1 7%
Unknown 11 73%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Mathematics 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%