↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Response of Vocal Fold Fibroblasts and Mesenchymal Stromal Cells to Vibration

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
The Response of Vocal Fold Fibroblasts and Mesenchymal Stromal Cells to Vibration
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0030965
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joel Gaston, Beatriz Quinchia Rios, Rebecca Bartlett, Craig Berchtold, Susan L. Thibeault

Abstract

Illumination of cellular changes caused by mechanical forces present within the laryngeal microenvironment may well guide strategies for tissue engineering the vocal fold lamina propria. The purpose of this study was to compare the response of human vocal fold fibroblasts (hVFF) and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSC) to vibratory stimulus. In order to study these effects, a bioreactor capable of vibrating two cell seeded substrates was developed. The cell seeded substrates contact each other as a result of the sinusoidal frequency, producing a motion similar to the movement of true vocal folds. Utilizing this bioreactor, hVFF and BM-MSC were subjected to 200 Hz vibration and 20% strain for 8 hours. Immunohistochemistry (Ki-67 and TUNEL) was performed to examine cell proliferation and apoptosis respectively, while semi-quantitative RT-PCR was used to assess extracellular matrix related gene expression. HVFF significantly proliferated (p = 0.011) when subjected to 200 Hz vibration and 20% strain, while BM-MSC did not (p = 1.0). A statistically significant increase in apoptosis of BM-MSC (p = 0.0402) was observed under the experimental conditions; however high cell viability (96%) was maintained. HVFF did not have significantly altered apoptosis (p = 0.7849) when subjected to vibration and strain. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR results show no significant differences in expression levels of collagen I (BM-MSC p = 0.1951, hVFF p = v0.3629), fibronectin (BM-MSC p = 0.1951, hVFF p = 0.2513), and TGF-β1 (BM-MSC p = 0.2534, hVFF p = 0.6029) between vibratory and static conditions in either cell type. Finally, smooth muscle actin mRNA was not present in either vibrated or static samples, indicating that no myofibroblast differentiation occurred for either cell type. Together, these results demonstrate that BM-MSC may be a suitable alternative to hVFF for vocal fold tissue engineering. Further investigation into a larger number of gene markers, protein levels, increased number of donors and vibratory conditions are warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 32%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 17%
Engineering 12 17%
Materials Science 4 6%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 10 14%