↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Fighting Misconceptions to Improve Compliance with Influenza Vaccination among Health Care Workers: An Educational Project

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Fighting Misconceptions to Improve Compliance with Influenza Vaccination among Health Care Workers: An Educational Project
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0030670
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carla R. Couto, Cláudio S. Pannuti, José P. Paz, Maria C. D. Fink, Alessandra A. Machado, Michela de Marchi, Clarisse M. Machado

Abstract

The compliance with influenza vaccination is poor among health care workers (HCWs) due to misconceptions about safety and effectiveness of influenza vaccine. We proposed an educational prospective study to demonstrate to HCWs that influenza vaccine is safe and that other respiratory viruses (RV) are the cause of respiratory symptoms in the months following influenza vaccination. 398 HCWs were surveyed for adverse events (AE) occurring within 48 h of vaccination. AE were reported by 30% of the HCWs. No severe AE was observed. A subset of 337 HCWs was followed up during four months, twice a week, for the detection of respiratory symptoms. RV was diagnosed by direct immunofluorescent assay (DFA) and real time PCR in symptomatic HCWs. Influenza A was detected in five episodes of respiratory symptoms (5.3%) and other RV in 26 (27.9%) episodes. The incidence density of influenza and other RV was 4.3 and 10.8 episodes per 100 HCW-month, respectively. The educational nature of the present study may persuade HCWs to develop a more positive attitude to influenza vaccination.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Psychology 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 9 26%
Unknown 7 21%