↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Breast-Milk Substitutes: A New Old-Threat for Breastfeeding Policy in Developing Countries. A Case Study in a Traditionally High Breastfeeding Country

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
Breast-Milk Substitutes: A New Old-Threat for Breastfeeding Policy in Developing Countries. A Case Study in a Traditionally High Breastfeeding Country
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0030634
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hubert Barennes, Gwenaelle Empis, Thao Duong Quang, Khouanheuan Sengkhamyong, Phonethepa Phasavath, Aina Harimanana, Emercia M. Sambany, Paulin N. Koffi

Abstract

Developing countries with traditionally breastfeeding are now experiencing the increasing pressure of formula milk marketing. This may endanger lives and undermine the efforts of national policies in achieving the objectives of the Millennium Development Goals. We examined the use of, and factors for use, of all available breast-milk substitutes (BMS) in a country with a traditionally high rate of breastfeeding.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 144 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 35 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 29 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 19%
Social Sciences 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Psychology 7 5%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 41 28%