↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Circadian Patterns of Wikipedia Editorial Activity: A Demographic Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
33 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
17 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
Circadian Patterns of Wikipedia Editorial Activity: A Demographic Analysis
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0030091
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taha Yasseri, Robert Sumi, János Kertész

Abstract

Wikipedia (WP) as a collaborative, dynamical system of humans is an appropriate subject of social studies. Each single action of the members of this society, i.e., editors, is well recorded and accessible. Using the cumulative data of 34 Wikipedias in different languages, we try to characterize and find the universalities and differences in temporal activity patterns of editors. Based on this data, we estimate the geographical distribution of editors for each WP in the globe. Furthermore we also clarify the differences among different groups of WPs, which originate in the variance of cultural and social features of the communities of editors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Ecuador 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 86 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 22%
Student > Master 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 25 26%
Social Sciences 21 22%
Physics and Astronomy 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 16 17%