↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Schizotypy and Behavioural Adjustment and the Role of Neuroticism

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Schizotypy and Behavioural Adjustment and the Role of Neuroticism
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0030078
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph Völter, Tilo Strobach, Désirée S. Aichert, Nicola Wöstmann, Anna Costa, Hans-Jürgen Möller, Torsten Schubert, Ulrich Ettinger

Abstract

In the present study the relationship between behavioural adjustment following cognitive conflict and schizotypy was investigated using a Stroop colour naming paradigm. Previous research has found deficits with behavioural adjustment in schizophrenia patients. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that individual differences in schizotypy, a personality trait reflecting the subclinical expression of the schizophrenia phenotype, would be associated with behavioural adjustment. Additionally, we investigated whether such a relationship would be explained by individual differences in neuroticism, a non-specific measure of negative trait emotionality known to be correlated with schizotypy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 41 62%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 8 12%