↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Combinations of Histone Modifications Mark Exon Inclusion Levels

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Combinations of Histone Modifications Mark Exon Inclusion Levels
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0029911
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Enroth, Susanne Bornelöv, Claes Wadelius, Jan Komorowski

Abstract

Splicing is a complex process regulated by sequence at the classical splice sites and other motifs in exons and introns with an enhancing or silencing effect. In addition, specific histone modifications on nucleosomes positioned over the exons have been shown to correlate both positively and negatively with exon expression. Here, we trained a model of "IF … THEN …" rules to predict exon inclusion levels in a transcript from histone modification patterns. Furthermore, we showed that combinations of histone modifications, in particular those residing on nucleosomes preceding or succeeding the exon, are better predictors of exon inclusion levels than single modifications. The resulting model was evaluated with cross validation and had an average accuracy of 72% for 27% of the exons, which demonstrates that epigenetic signals substantially mark alternative splicing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Netherlands 1 2%
France 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Greece 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 56 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 27%
Researcher 14 21%
Professor 11 17%
Student > Master 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 18%
Computer Science 7 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 8%