↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Return on Investment of a Medicaid Tobacco Cessation Program in Massachusetts

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
22 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Return on Investment of a Medicaid Tobacco Cessation Program in Massachusetts
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0029665
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick Richard, Kristina West, Leighton Ku

Abstract

A high proportion of low-income people insured by the Medicaid program smoke. Earlier research concerning a comprehensive tobacco cessation program implemented by the state of Massachusetts indicated that it was successful in reducing smoking prevalence and those who received tobacco cessation benefits had lower rates of in-patient admissions for cardiovascular conditions, including acute myocardial infarction, coronary atherosclerosis and non-specific chest pain. This study estimates the costs of the tobacco cessation benefit and the short-term Medicaid savings attributable to the aversion of inpatient hospitalization for cardiovascular conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 98 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 19%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 11%
Other 8 8%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 22%
Social Sciences 21 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 25 25%