↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Positivity of the English Language

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
81 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Positivity of the English Language
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0029484
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabel M. Kloumann, Christopher M. Danforth, Kameron Decker Harris, Catherine A. Bliss, Peter Sheridan Dodds

Abstract

Over the last million years, human language has emerged and evolved as a fundamental instrument of social communication and semiotic representation. People use language in part to convey emotional information, leading to the central and contingent questions: (1) What is the emotional spectrum of natural language? and (2) Are natural languages neutrally, positively, or negatively biased? Here, we report that the human-perceived positivity of over 10,000 of the most frequently used English words exhibits a clear positive bias. More deeply, we characterize and quantify distributions of word positivity for four large and distinct corpora, demonstrating that their form is broadly invariant with respect to frequency of word use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 3 2%
United States 3 2%
France 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
China 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 148 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 23%
Student > Bachelor 28 16%
Student > Master 25 15%
Researcher 18 11%
Professor 12 7%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 22 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 23 14%
Linguistics 20 12%
Computer Science 20 12%
Psychology 19 11%
Arts and Humanities 15 9%
Other 48 28%
Unknown 25 15%