↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Large-Scale Pathway-Based Analysis of Bladder Cancer Genome-Wide Association Data from Five Studies of European Background

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Large-Scale Pathway-Based Analysis of Bladder Cancer Genome-Wide Association Data from Five Studies of European Background
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0029396
Pubmed ID
Authors

Idan Menashe, Jonine D. Figueroa, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Nuria Malats, Antoni Picornell, Dennis Maeder, Qi Yang, Ludmila Prokunina-Olsson, Zhaoming Wang, Francisco X. Real, Kevin B. Jacobs, Dalsu Baris, Michael Thun, Demetrius Albanes, Mark P. Purdue, Manolis Kogevinas, Amy Hutchinson, Yi-Ping Fu, Wei Tang, Laurie Burdette, Adonina Tardón, Consol Serra, Alfredo Carrato, Reina García-Closas, Josep Lloreta, Alison Johnson, Molly Schwenn, Alan Schned, Gerald Andriole, Amanda Black, Eric J. Jacobs, Ryan W. Diver, Susan M. Gapstur, Stephanie J. Weinstein, Jarmo Virtamo, Neil E. Caporaso, Maria Teresa Landi, Joseph F. Fraumeni, Stephen J. Chanock, Debra T. Silverman, Nathaniel Rothman

Abstract

Pathway analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) offer a unique opportunity to collectively evaluate genetic variants with effects that are too small to be detected individually. We applied a pathway analysis to a bladder cancer GWAS containing data from 3,532 cases and 5,120 controls of European background (n = 5 studies). Thirteen hundred and ninety-nine pathways were drawn from five publicly available resources (Biocarta, Kegg, NCI-PID, HumanCyc, and Reactome), and we constructed 22 additional candidate pathways previously hypothesized to be related to bladder cancer. In total, 1421 pathways, 5647 genes and ∼90,000 SNPs were included in our study. Logistic regression model adjusting for age, sex, study, DNA source, and smoking status was used to assess the marginal trend effect of SNPs on bladder cancer risk. Two complementary pathway-based methods (gene-set enrichment analysis [GSEA], and adapted rank-truncated product [ARTP]) were used to assess the enrichment of association signals within each pathway. Eighteen pathways were detected by either GSEA or ARTP at P≤0.01. To minimize false positives, we used the I(2) statistic to identify SNPs displaying heterogeneous effects across the five studies. After removing these SNPs, seven pathways ('Aromatic amine metabolism' [P(GSEA) = 0.0100, P(ARTP) = 0.0020], 'NAD biosynthesis' [P(GSEA) = 0.0018, P(ARTP) = 0.0086], 'NAD salvage' [P(ARTP) = 0.0068], 'Clathrin derived vesicle budding' [P(ARTP) = 0.0018], 'Lysosome vesicle biogenesis' [P(GSEA) = 0.0023, P(ARTP)<0.00012], 'Retrograde neurotrophin signaling' [P(GSEA) = 0.00840], and 'Mitotic metaphase/anaphase transition' [P(GSEA) = 0.0040]) remained. These pathways seem to belong to three fundamental cellular processes (metabolic detoxification, mitosis, and clathrin-mediated vesicles). Identification of the aromatic amine metabolism pathway provides support for the ability of this approach to identify pathways with established relevance to bladder carcinogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 8%
Spain 3 5%
Sweden 1 2%
France 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 54 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Other 6 9%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Computer Science 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 8 12%