↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Comparing Statistical Methods for Constructing Large Scale Gene Networks

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
351 Mendeley
citeulike
12 CiteULike
Title
Comparing Statistical Methods for Constructing Large Scale Gene Networks
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0029348
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey D. Allen, Yang Xie, Min Chen, Luc Girard, Guanghua Xiao

Abstract

The gene regulatory network (GRN) reveals the regulatory relationships among genes and can provide a systematic understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying biological processes. The importance of computer simulations in understanding cellular processes is now widely accepted; a variety of algorithms have been developed to study these biological networks. The goal of this study is to provide a comprehensive evaluation and a practical guide to aid in choosing statistical methods for constructing large scale GRNs. Using both simulation studies and a real application in E. coli data, we compare different methods in terms of sensitivity and specificity in identifying the true connections and the hub genes, the ease of use, and computational speed. Our results show that these algorithms performed reasonably well, and each method has its own advantages: (1) GeneNet, WGCNA (Weighted Correlation Network Analysis), and ARACNE (Algorithm for the Reconstruction of Accurate Cellular Networks) performed well in constructing the global network structure; (2) GeneNet and SPACE (Sparse PArtial Correlation Estimation) performed well in identifying a few connections with high specificity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 5%
Brazil 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 312 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 120 34%
Researcher 70 20%
Student > Master 45 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Other 51 15%
Unknown 29 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 162 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 53 15%
Computer Science 38 11%
Mathematics 18 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 3%
Other 35 10%
Unknown 36 10%