↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Long-Term Care Facilities: Important Participants of the Acute Care Facility Social Network?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Long-Term Care Facilities: Important Participants of the Acute Care Facility Social Network?
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0029342
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce Y. Lee, Yeohan Song, Sarah M. Bartsch, Diane S. Kim, Ashima Singh, Taliser R. Avery, Shawn T. Brown, S. Levent Yilmaz, Kim F. Wong, Margaret A. Potter, Donald S. Burke, Richard Platt, Susan S. Huang

Abstract

Acute care facilities are connected via patient sharing, forming a network. However, patient sharing extends beyond this immediate network to include sharing with long-term care facilities. The extent of long-term care facility patient sharing on the acute care facility network is unknown. The objective of this study was to characterize and determine the extent and pattern of patient transfers to, from, and between long-term care facilities on the network of acute care facilities in a large metropolitan county.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 11%
Computer Science 5 11%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Other 14 30%
Unknown 5 11%