↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Significance of African Lions for the Financial Viability of Trophy Hunting and the Maintenance of Wild Land

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
28 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
388 Mendeley
Title
The Significance of African Lions for the Financial Viability of Trophy Hunting and the Maintenance of Wild Land
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0029332
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Andrew Lindsey, Guy Andrew Balme, Vernon Richard Booth, Neil Midlane

Abstract

Recent studies indicate that trophy hunting is impacting negatively on some lion populations, notably in Tanzania. In 2004 there was a proposal to list lions on CITES Appendix I and in 2011 animal-welfare groups petitioned the United States government to list lions as endangered under their Endangered Species Act. Such listings would likely curtail the trophy hunting of lions by limiting the import of lion trophies. Concurrent efforts are underway to encourage the European Union to ban lion trophy imports. We assessed the significance of lions to the financial viability of trophy hunting across five countries to help determine the financial impact and advisability of the proposed trade restrictions. Lion hunts attract the highest mean prices (US$24,000-US$71,000) of all trophy species. Lions generate 5-17% of gross trophy hunting income on national levels, the proportional significance highest in Mozambique, Tanzania, and Zambia. If lion hunting was effectively precluded, trophy hunting could potentially become financially unviable across at least 59,538 km(2) that could result in a concomitant loss of habitat. However, the loss of lion hunting could have other potentially broader negative impacts including reduction of competitiveness of wildlife-based land uses relative to ecologically unfavourable alternatives. Restrictions on lion hunting may also reduce tolerance for the species among communities where local people benefit from trophy hunting, and may reduce funds available for anti-poaching. If lion off-takes were reduced to recommended maximums (0.5/1000 km(2)), the loss of viability and reduction in profitability would be much lower than if lion hunting was stopped altogether (7,005 km(2)). We recommend that interventions focus on reducing off-takes to sustainable levels, implementing age-based regulations and improving governance of trophy hunting. Such measures could ensure sustainability, while retaining incentives for the conservation of lions and their habitat from hunting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 388 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 7 2%
United States 5 1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Zimbabwe 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 362 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 93 24%
Student > Bachelor 69 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 15%
Researcher 53 14%
Student > Postgraduate 22 6%
Other 44 11%
Unknown 50 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 171 44%
Environmental Science 103 27%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 2%
Social Sciences 9 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Other 32 8%
Unknown 56 14%