↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Science Priorities for Seamounts: Research Links to Conservation and Management

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Science Priorities for Seamounts: Research Links to Conservation and Management
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0029232
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malcolm R. Clark, Thomas A. Schlacher, Ashley A. Rowden, Karen I. Stocks, Mireille Consalvey

Abstract

Seamounts shape the topography of all ocean basins and can be hotspots of biological activity in the deep sea. The Census of Marine Life on Seamounts (CenSeam) was a field program that examined seamounts as part of the global Census of Marine Life (CoML) initiative from 2005 to 2010. CenSeam progressed seamount science by collating historical data, collecting new data, undertaking regional and global analyses of seamount biodiversity, mapping species and habitat distributions, challenging established paradigms of seamount ecology, developing new hypotheses, and documenting the impacts of human activities on seamounts. However, because of the large number of seamounts globally, much about the structure, function and connectivity of seamount ecosystems remains unexplored and unknown. Continual, and potentially increasing, threats to seamount resources from fishing and seabed mining are creating a pressing demand for research to inform conservation and management strategies. To meet this need, intensive science effort in the following areas will be needed: 1) Improved physical and biological data; of particular importance is information on seamount location, physical characteristics (e.g. habitat heterogeneity and complexity), more complete and intensive biodiversity inventories, and increased understanding of seamount connectivity and faunal dispersal; 2) New human impact data; these shall encompass better studies on the effects of human activities on seamount ecosystems, as well as monitoring long-term changes in seamount assemblages following impacts (e.g. recovery); 3) Global data repositories; there is a pressing need for more comprehensive fisheries catch and effort data, especially on the high seas, and compilation or maintenance of geological and biodiversity databases that underpin regional and global analyses; 4) Application of support tools in a data-poor environment; conservation and management will have to increasingly rely on predictive modelling techniques, critical evaluation of environmental surrogates as faunal "proxies", and ecological risk assessment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
Brazil 3 1%
South Africa 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Jersey 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 265 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 63 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 14%
Student > Master 39 14%
Student > Bachelor 37 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 53 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 36%
Environmental Science 71 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 9 3%
Unknown 60 21%