↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Genetic Profiling Using Genome-Wide Significant Coronary Artery Disease Risk Variants Does Not Improve the Prediction of Subclinical Atherosclerosis: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study, the…

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Genetic Profiling Using Genome-Wide Significant Coronary Artery Disease Risk Variants Does Not Improve the Prediction of Subclinical Atherosclerosis: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study, the Bogalusa Heart Study and the Health 2000 Survey – A Meta-Analysis of Three Independent Studies
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0028931
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jussi A. Hernesniemi, Ilkka Seppälä, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Nina Mononen, Niku Oksala, Nina Hutri-Kähönen, Markus Juonala, Leena Taittonen, Erin N. Smith, Nicholas J. Schork, Wei Chen, Sathanur R. Srinivasan, Gerald S. Berenson, Sarah S. Murray, Tomi Laitinen, Antti Jula, Johannes Kettunen, Samuli Ripatti, Reijo Laaksonen, Jorma Viikari, Mika Kähönen, Olli T. Raitakari, Terho Lehtimäki

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified a large number of variants (SNPs) associating with an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Recently, the CARDIoGRAM consortium published a GWAS based on the largest study population so far. They successfully replicated twelve already known associations and discovered thirteen new SNPs associating with CAD. We examined whether the genetic profiling of these variants improves prediction of subclinical atherosclerosis--i.e., carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and carotid artery elasticity (CAE)--beyond classical risk factors.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Professor 5 9%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 10 18%