↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Systematic Conservation Planning in the Face of Climate Change: Bet-Hedging on the Columbia Plateau

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
Systematic Conservation Planning in the Face of Climate Change: Bet-Hedging on the Columbia Plateau
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0028788
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carrie A. Schloss, Joshua J. Lawler, Eric R. Larson, Hilary L. Papendick, Michael J. Case, Daniel M. Evans, Jack H. DeLap, Jesse G. R. Langdon, Sonia A. Hall, Brad H. McRae

Abstract

Systematic conservation planning efforts typically focus on protecting current patterns of biodiversity. Climate change is poised to shift species distributions, reshuffle communities, and alter ecosystem functioning. In such a dynamic environment, lands selected to protect today's biodiversity may fail to do so in the future. One proposed approach to designing reserve networks that are robust to climate change involves protecting the diversity of abiotic conditions that in part determine species distributions and ecological processes. A set of abiotically diverse areas will likely support a diversity of ecological systems both today and into the future, although those two sets of systems might be dramatically different. Here, we demonstrate a conservation planning approach based on representing unique combinations of abiotic factors. We prioritize sites that represent the diversity of soils, topographies, and current climates of the Columbia Plateau. We then compare these sites to sites prioritized to protect current biodiversity. This comparison highlights places that are important for protecting both today's biodiversity and the diversity of abiotic factors that will likely determine biodiversity patterns in the future. It also highlights places where a reserve network designed solely to protect today's biodiversity would fail to capture the diversity of abiotic conditions and where such a network could be augmented to be more robust to climate-change impacts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 154 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 19%
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 10 6%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 12 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 41%
Environmental Science 60 38%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Chemical Engineering 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 19 12%