↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Impact of Immunization Technology and Assay Application on Antibody Performance – A Systematic Comparative Evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Impact of Immunization Technology and Assay Application on Antibody Performance – A Systematic Comparative Evaluation
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0028718
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael C. Brown, Tony R. Joaquim, Ross Chambers, Dale V. Onisk, Fenglin Yin, Janet M. Moriango, Yichun Xu, David A. Fancy, Erin L. Crowgey, Yida He, James W. Stave, Klaus Lindpaintner

Abstract

Antibodies are quintessential affinity reagents for the investigation and determination of a protein's expression patterns, localization, quantitation, modifications, purification, and functional understanding. Antibodies are typically used in techniques such as Western blot, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), among others. The methods employed to generate antibodies can have a profound impact on their success in any of these applications. We raised antibodies against 10 serum proteins using 3 immunization methods: peptide antigens (3 per protein), DNA prime/protein fragment-boost ("DNA immunization"; 3 per protein), and full length protein. Antibodies thus generated were systematically evaluated using several different assay technologies (ELISA, IHC, and Western blot). Antibodies raised against peptides worked predominantly in applications where the target protein was denatured (57% success in Western blot, 66% success in immunohistochemistry), although 37% of the antibodies thus generated did not work in any of these applications. In contrast, antibodies produced by DNA immunization performed well against both denatured and native targets with a high level of success: 93% success in Western blots, 100% success in immunohistochemistry, and 79% success in ELISA. Importantly, success in one assay method was not predictive of success in another. Immunization with full length protein consistently yielded the best results; however, this method is not typically available for new targets, due to the difficulty of generating full length protein. We conclude that DNA immunization strategies which are not encumbered by the limitations of efficacy (peptides) or requirements for full length proteins can be quite successful, particularly when multiple constructs for each protein are used.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Other 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 11 14%