↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Respiratory Response of the Deep-Sea Amphipod Stephonyx biscayensis Indicates Bathymetric Range Limitation by Temperature and Hydrostatic Pressure

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Respiratory Response of the Deep-Sea Amphipod Stephonyx biscayensis Indicates Bathymetric Range Limitation by Temperature and Hydrostatic Pressure
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0028562
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alastair Brown, Sven Thatje

Abstract

Depth zonation of fauna on continental margins is well documented. Whilst increasing hydrostatic pressure with depth has long been considered a factor contributing significantly to this pattern, discussion of the relative significance of decreasing temperature with depth has continued. This study investigates the physiological tolerances of fed and starved specimens of the bathyal lysianassoid amphipod Stephonyx biscayensis at varying temperature to acute pressure exposure by measuring the rate of oxygen consumption. Acclimation to atmospheric pressure is shown to have no significant interaction with temperature and/or pressure effects. Similarly, starvation is shown to have no significant effect on the interaction of temperature and pressure. Subsequently, the effect of pressure on respiration rate is revealed to be dependent on temperature: pressure equivalent to 2000 m depth was tolerated at 1 and 3°C; pressure equivalent to 2500 m depth was tolerated at 5.5°C; at 10°C pressure equivalent to 3000 m depth was tolerated. The variation in tolerance is consistent with the natural distribution range reported for this species. There are clear implications for hypotheses relating to the observed phenomenon of a biodiversity bottleneck between 2000 and 3000 metres, and for the potential for bathymetric range shifts in response to global climate change.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 59 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Professor 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 40%
Environmental Science 11 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 25%