↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Reproductive Biology and Its Impact on Body Size: Comparative Analysis of Mammalian, Avian and Dinosaurian Reproduction

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
6 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Reproductive Biology and Its Impact on Body Size: Comparative Analysis of Mammalian, Avian and Dinosaurian Reproduction
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0028442
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Werner, Eva Maria Griebeler

Abstract

Janis and Carrano (1992) suggested that large dinosaurs might have faced a lower risk of extinction under ecological changes than similar-sized mammals because large dinosaurs had a higher potential reproductive output than similar-sized mammals (JC hypothesis). First, we tested the assumption underlying the JC hypothesis. We therefore analysed the potential reproductive output (reflected in clutch/litter size and annual offspring number) of extant terrestrial mammals and birds (as "dinosaur analogs") and of extinct dinosaurs. With the exception of rodents, the differences in the reproductive output of similar-sized birds and mammals proposed by Janis and Carrano (1992) existed even at the level of single orders. Fossil dinosaur clutches were larger than litters of similar-sized mammals, and dinosaur clutch sizes were comparable to those of similar-sized birds. Because the extinction risk of extant species often correlates with a low reproductive output, the latter difference suggests a lower risk of population extinction in dinosaurs than in mammals. Second, we present a very simple, mathematical model that demonstrates the advantage of a high reproductive output underlying the JC hypothesis. It predicts that a species with a high reproductive output that usually faces very high juvenile mortalities will benefit more strongly in terms of population size from reduced juvenile mortalities (e.g., resulting from a stochastic reduction in population size) than a species with a low reproductive output that usually comprises low juvenile mortalities. Based on our results, we suggest that reproductive strategy could have contributed to the evolution of the exceptional gigantism seen in dinosaurs that does not exist in extant terrestrial mammals. Large dinosaurs, e.g., the sauropods, may have easily sustained populations of very large-bodied species over evolutionary time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Argentina 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 130 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 24%
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 29 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 34 24%
Environmental Science 11 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 33 24%