↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Poor Trail Making Test Performance Is Directly Associated with Altered Dual Task Prioritization in the Elderly – Baseline Results from the TREND Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Poor Trail Making Test Performance Is Directly Associated with Altered Dual Task Prioritization in the Elderly – Baseline Results from the TREND Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0027831
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus A. Hobert, Raphael Niebler, Sinja I. Meyer, Kathrin Brockmann, Clemens Becker, Heiko Huber, Alexandra Gaenslen, Jana Godau, Gerhard W. Eschweiler, Daniela Berg, Walter Maetzler

Abstract

Deterioration of executive functions in the elderly has been associated with impairments in walking performance. This may be caused by limited cognitive flexibility and working memory, but could also be caused by altered prioritization of simultaneously performed tasks. To disentangle these options we investigated the associations between Trail Making Test performance--which specifically measures cognitive flexibility and working memory--and dual task costs, a measure of prioritization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Netherlands 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 178 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 14%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 29 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 29%
Psychology 28 15%
Neuroscience 17 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Sports and Recreations 10 5%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 42 23%