↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Structural Identifiability of Systems Biology Models: A Critical Comparison of Methods

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
374 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Structural Identifiability of Systems Biology Models: A Critical Comparison of Methods
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0027755
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oana-Teodora Chis, Julio R. Banga, Eva Balsa-Canto

Abstract

Analysing the properties of a biological system through in silico experimentation requires a satisfactory mathematical representation of the system including accurate values of the model parameters. Fortunately, modern experimental techniques allow obtaining time-series data of appropriate quality which may then be used to estimate unknown parameters. However, in many cases, a subset of those parameters may not be uniquely estimated, independently of the experimental data available or the numerical techniques used for estimation. This lack of identifiability is related to the structure of the model, i.e. the system dynamics plus the observation function. Despite the interest in knowing a priori whether there is any chance of uniquely estimating all model unknown parameters, the structural identifiability analysis for general non-linear dynamic models is still an open question. There is no method amenable to every model, thus at some point we have to face the selection of one of the possibilities. This work presents a critical comparison of the currently available techniques. To this end, we perform the structural identifiability analysis of a collection of biological models. The results reveal that the generating series approach, in combination with identifiability tableaus, offers the most advantageous compromise among range of applicability, computational complexity and information provided.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 2%
Germany 7 2%
United States 6 2%
Canada 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 341 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 114 30%
Researcher 86 23%
Student > Master 37 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 4%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 52 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 76 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 18%
Mathematics 42 11%
Computer Science 22 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 5%
Other 74 20%
Unknown 75 20%