↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Evaluating Tidal Marsh Sustainability in the Face of Sea-Level Rise: A Hybrid Modeling Approach Applied to San Francisco Bay

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating Tidal Marsh Sustainability in the Face of Sea-Level Rise: A Hybrid Modeling Approach Applied to San Francisco Bay
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0027388
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana Stralberg, Matthew Brennan, John C. Callaway, Julian K. Wood, Lisa M. Schile, Dennis Jongsomjit, Maggi Kelly, V. Thomas Parker, Stephen Crooks

Abstract

Tidal marshes will be threatened by increasing rates of sea-level rise (SLR) over the next century. Managers seek guidance on whether existing and restored marshes will be resilient under a range of potential future conditions, and on prioritizing marsh restoration and conservation activities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 4%
Germany 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 243 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 74 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 15%
Student > Master 39 15%
Other 16 6%
Student > Bachelor 13 5%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 40 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 98 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 8%
Engineering 12 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 <1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 50 19%