↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Strategies for Metagenomic-Guided Whole-Community Proteomics of Complex Microbial Environments

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Strategies for Metagenomic-Guided Whole-Community Proteomics of Complex Microbial Environments
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0027173
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brandi L. Cantarel, Alison R. Erickson, Nathan C. VerBerkmoes, Brian K. Erickson, Patricia A. Carey, Chongle Pan, Manesh Shah, Emmanuel F. Mongodin, Janet K. Jansson, Claire M. Fraser-Liggett, Robert L. Hettich

Abstract

Accurate protein identification in large-scale proteomics experiments relies upon a detailed, accurate protein catalogue, which is derived from predictions of open reading frames based on genome sequence data. Integration of mass spectrometry-based proteomics data with computational proteome predictions from environmental metagenomic sequences has been challenging because of the variable overlap between proteomic datasets and corresponding short-read nucleotide sequence data. In this study, we have benchmarked several strategies for increasing microbial peptide spectral matching in metaproteomic datasets using protein predictions generated from matched metagenomic sequences from the same human fecal samples. Additionally, we investigated the impact of mass spectrometry-based filters (high mass accuracy, delta correlation), and de novo peptide sequencing on the number and robustness of peptide-spectrum assignments in these complex datasets. In summary, we find that high mass accuracy peptide measurements searched against non-assembled reads from DNA sequencing of the same samples significantly increased identifiable proteins without sacrificing accuracy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Denmark 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 114 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 23%
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Computer Science 4 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 25 19%