↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Reading Text Increases Binocular Disparity in Dyslexic Children

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Reading Text Increases Binocular Disparity in Dyslexic Children
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0027105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie A. Kirkby, Hazel I. Blythe, Denis Drieghe, Simon P. Liversedge

Abstract

Children with developmental dyslexia show reading impairment compared to their peers, despite being matched on IQ, socio-economic background, and educational opportunities. The neurological and cognitive basis of dyslexia remains a highly debated topic. Proponents of the magnocellular theory, which postulates abnormalities in the M-stream of the visual pathway cause developmental dyslexia, claim that children with dyslexia have deficient binocular coordination, and this is the underlying cause of developmental dyslexia. We measured binocular coordination during reading and a non-linguistic scanning task in three participant groups: adults, typically developing children, and children with dyslexia. A significant increase in fixation disparity was observed for dyslexic children solely when reading. Our study casts serious doubts on the claims of the magnocellular theory. The exclusivity of increased fixation disparity in dyslexics during reading might be a result of the allocation of inadequate attentional and/or cognitive resources to the reading process, or suboptimal linguistic processing per se.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 105 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Researcher 11 10%
Other 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 26 23%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 25%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 8%
Neuroscience 8 7%
Linguistics 8 7%
Other 26 23%
Unknown 24 21%