↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

How Did the Spider Cross the River? Behavioral Adaptations for River-Bridging Webs in Caerostris darwini (Araneae: Araneidae)

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
How Did the Spider Cross the River? Behavioral Adaptations for River-Bridging Webs in Caerostris darwini (Araneae: Araneidae)
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0026847
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matjaž Gregorič, Ingi Agnarsson, Todd A. Blackledge, Matjaž Kuntner

Abstract

Interspecific coevolution is well described, but we know significantly less about how multiple traits coevolve within a species, particularly between behavioral traits and biomechanical properties of animals' "extended phenotypes". In orb weaving spiders, coevolution of spider behavior with ecological and physical traits of their webs is expected. Darwin's bark spider (Caerostris darwini) bridges large water bodies, building the largest known orb webs utilizing the toughest known silk. Here, we examine C. darwini web building behaviors to establish how bridge lines are formed over water. We also test the prediction that this spider's unique web ecology and architecture coevolved with new web building behaviors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 4%
United States 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Réunion 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
India 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 57 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 13%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 8 12%