↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Killing Them with Kindness? In-Hive Medications May Inhibit Xenobiotic Efflux Transporters and Endanger Honey Bees

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
31 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Killing Them with Kindness? In-Hive Medications May Inhibit Xenobiotic Efflux Transporters and Endanger Honey Bees
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0026796
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J. Hawthorne, Galen P. Dively

Abstract

Honey bees (Apis mellifera) have recently experienced higher than normal overwintering colony losses. Many factors have been evoked to explain the losses, among which are the presence of residues of pesticides and veterinary products in hives. Multiple residues are present at the same time, though most often in low concentrations so that no single product has yet been associated with losses. Involvement of a combination of residues to losses may however not be excluded. To understand the impact of an exposure to combined residues on honey bees, we propose a mechanism-based strategy, focusing here on Multi-Drug Resistance (MDR) transporters as mediators of those interactions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
France 2 1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 132 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 17%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 19 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 55%
Environmental Science 13 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 25 17%